mark49•4d ago

The day I realized moon landing deniers never looked at the actual photos

So I was talking to my neighbor last week about the Apollo missions, and he goes "oh those are all faked in a studio." I asked him if he had ever actually looked at the landing site images from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, the ones that show the descent stages and rover tracks. He just stared at me. I mean, if you zoom in on those photos from 2009, you can literally see the shadows of the equipment left behind. Made me wonder, how many people just repeat what they hear without checking the source material themselves - has anyone else had that moment where a simple fact check just killed a whole argument dead?

2 comments

2 Comments

aaron_gonzalez4d ago

I remember reading through some of the NASA technical reports from the 1960s. One thing that always stuck with me was how much thought went into the lighting on the moon. The sun angle is different than what you'd get in a studio because the moon has no atmosphere to scatter the light. Those shadows in the Apollo photos are way too sharp and dark to be from any artificial light setup on Earth. I get that people want to question authority sometimes, but the physics of how light works on the lunar surface just doesn't match a Hollywood soundstage. It's one thing to be skeptical, but another to ignore basic science that explains those photos perfectly.

rowan2624d ago

Best advice I got was check the shadows yourself, they never lie on the moon.