8
Someone told me my 'evidence' for the moon landing being fake was just a bad YouTube video
I used to share this one video about flag movement a lot in these talks. A user here named 'SkyCheck' broke down each clip frame by frame, showing the studio lights and camera shake that proved it was real footage. They linked to the actual NASA technical documents from 1969. I looked at the docs for about an hour and realized my whole point was based on a cut-up edit. Now I always ask for primary sources, not just videos. Has anyone else had a go-to argument completely fall apart when you checked the original material?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
the_drew1mo ago
Yeah, the "go-to argument falling apart" thing hits hard... I had this whole rant about how the lunar rover couldn't work in a vacuum. Then I actually read the Apollo 15 mission report. Turns out they tested it in a vacuum chamber on Earth for months. My big proof was just me not knowing how motors and seals work. Felt like @ryan494 after his third "water always finds its level" demo video failed. Now I just assume the primary source will prove me wrong.
3